Strategy for Student Communication in Virtual Courses

Estrategia para la Comunicación Estudiantil en Cursos Virtuales

Main Article Content

Yurley Medina Cárdenas
Eduar Bayona Ibáñez
Dewar Rico Bautista
Abstract

In online education, one of the most relevant concerns is meaningful learning from the application of new technologies for the acquisition and administration of knowledge autonomously by the student. Collaborative work has been incorporated into virtual courses to support learning, hence the importance of applying the appropriate strategies through a pedagogical method that manages to measure the level of knowledge construction. Using the right tools improves results. Efficient communication is a fundamental tool for conveying ideas and making decisions. In the digital environment, communication takes on multiple languages and forms, depending on the people who interact. In virtual courses, educational institutions have established a common language to facilitate interaction. Technologies in a virtual environment can significantly improve communication, as long as harmony and respect between the interlocutors are maintained. One of the advantages of Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) is flexibility in terms of space and time, although it is necessary to follow a common prototype or language to ensure an effective flow of information and true communication. To achieve effective communication, the rules of virtual Netiquette, the TIGRE rubric and the Gunawardena model are deepened.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Ahmad, M., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2022). Automatic content analysis of asynchronous discussion forum transcripts: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11355–11410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11065-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11065-w

Almaguer-Perez, D., & Hernández-Yeja, A. (2021). Buenas prácticas para el despliegue seguro del servicio de correo electrónico. Revista Científica, 41(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.15838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.15838

Cárdenas Espinosa, R. D. (2019). Ecosistemas tecnológicos mediados por TIC desde la virtualidad para la investigación formativa en contexto. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 7(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v7i2.21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v7i2.21

Cebollero-Salinas, A., Cano-Escoriaza, J., Orejudo, S., & Íñiguez-Berrozpe, T. (2022). Netiquette, implication of online emotional content and empathy in adolescents according to gender. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 54. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2022.v54.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2022.v54.12

Conaway, R. N., Easton, S. S., & Schmidt, W. V. (2005). Strategies for Enhancing Student Interaction and Immediacy in Online Courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 68(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569904273300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569904273300

de Deus, D. R., Parreira, F. R., Paiva, M. de F. C., de Lourdes Miguel Alcântara, M., de Cesaro Antunes, P., & Batista, S. M. (2022). TEIA: Intersectoral Topics and Strategies with Community Health Workers (CHWs), Education, Communication, and Health Promotion in Times of Pandemic. In International Handbook of Teaching and Learning in Health Promotion (pp. 167–187). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96005-6_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96005-6_12

De Wever, B., Keer, H. Van, Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.008

Dondera, R., Jia, C., Popescu, V., Nita-Rotaru, C., Dark, M., & York, C. S. (2008). Virtual Classroom Extension for Effective Distance Education. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2008.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2008.19

Durán, R., Estay-Niculcar, C., & Álvarez, H. (2015). Adopción de buenas prácticas en la educación virtual en la educación superior. Aula Abierta, 43(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aula.2015.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aula.2015.01.001

Fernández Cárdenas, J. M., Yáñez Figueroa, J. A., & Muñoz Villarreal, E. K. (2015). Prácticas morales y normas de netiqueta en las interacciones virtuales de los estudiantes de educación secundaria. Innovación Educativa, 15(69), 57–71. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179443505005

Fernández-Ordóñez, J. M., Jiménez, L. E. M., Torres-Carrión, P., Barba-Guamán, L., & Rodríguez-Morales, G. (2019). Experiencia Afectiva Usuario en ambientes con Inteligencia Artificial, Sensores Biométricos y/o Recursos Digitales Accesibles: Una Revisión Sistemática de Literatura. RISTI - Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, 35, 35–53. https://doi.org/10.17013/risti.35.35-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17013/risti.35.35-53

Floren, L. C., ten Cate, O., Irby, D. M., & O’Brien, B. C. (2021). An interaction analysis model to study knowledge construction in interprofessional education: proof of concept. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(5), 736–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1797653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1797653

Frisendahl, B. R. (2014). Virtual information training for a global business. Business Information Review, 31(4), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114562104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114562104

Guilleumas-García, R. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., Mena, J., & Pinto-Llorente, A. M. (2020). Students’ Perception of Distributed Teaching Presence in Discussion Forums. A Case Study (pp. 249–270). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45781-5_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45781-5_12

Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG

Guo, C., Shea, P., & Chen, X. (2022). Investigation on graduate students’ social presence and social knowledge construction in two online discussion settings. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2751–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10716-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10716-8

Gurjar, N., & Bai, H. (2023). Assessing culturally inclusive instructional design in online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1253–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10226-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10226-z

Hernán Galvis, Á., López González, Y. Y., & Aarón Gonzálvez, M. A. (2018). Aprendiendo de una transformación de prácticas pedagógicas en cursos de maestría en la modalidad híbrida de aprendizaje. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 18(58). https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/350951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/red/58/2

Medina Cárdenas, Y. C., & Rico Bautista, D. W. (2014). The tutorial function: Design of strategies for promoting collaborative learning in virtual environments [La función tutorial: Diseño de estrategias para el fomento del aprendizaje colaborativo en ambientes virtuales]. In B. J. O. A. T. A. Callaos N. Sanchez B. (Ed.), CISCI 2014 - Decima Tercera Conferencia Iberoamericana en Sistemas, Cibernetica e Informatica, Undecimo Simposium Iberoamericano en Educacion, Cibernetica e Informatica, SIECI 2014 - Memorias (pp. 248–253). International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84923116858&partnerID=40&md5=765e40910d701c6a36095f64b2c17742

Medina-Cárdenas, Y., & Rico-Bautista, D. (2015). La función tutorial: Diseño de estrategias para el fomento del aprendizaje colaborativo en ambientes virtuales. Signos Universitarios, 248–253.

Medina-Cárdenas, Y., Rico-Bautista, D., & Rico-Bautista, N. (2011). Tutorial function quality in virtual environments. Revista Educación En Ingeniería, 6(12), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v6n12.127

Ratan, R., Ucha, C., Lei, Y., Lim, C., Triwibowo, W., Yelon, S., Sheahan, A., Lamb, B., Deni, B., & Hua Chen, V. H. (2022). How do social presence and active learning in synchronous and asynchronous online classes relate to students’ perceived course gains? Computers & Education, 191, 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104621

Romero, G. (2018). Calidad educativa: engranaje entre la gestión del conocimiento, la gestión educativa, la innovación y los ambientes de aprendizaje. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias En Educación, 17(0717–6945), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20181735romero6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20181735romero6

Sareen, S., & Mandal, S. (2024). Challenges of blended learning in higher education across global north-south: A systematic and integrative literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101011

Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 957–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.025

Valtonen, T., López-Pernas, S., Saqr, M., Vartiainen, H., Sointu, E. T., & Tedre, M. (2022). The nature and building blocks of educational technology research. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107123

Vidal Martínez, A. A., & Camarena Gómez, B. O. (2014). Retos y posibilidades de los cursos en línea a partir de una experiencia concreta. Pixel-Bit Revista de Medios y Educación, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2014.i44.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2014.i44.02

Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Effects of online teaching presence on students’ interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12408

Williams, N. D., Gallardo-Williams, M. T., Griffith, E. H., & Bretz, S. L. (2022). Investigating Meaningful Learning in Virtual Reality Organic Chemistry Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 1100–1105. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00476

Zhang, N., Liu, Q., Zheng, X., Luo, L., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Analysis of Social Interaction and Behavior Patterns in the Process of Online to Offline Lesson Study: A Case Study of Chemistry Teaching Design based on Augmented Reality. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1866493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1866493

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |