Multi-criteria analysis for the selection of advanced oxidation technologies in the treatment of emerging pollutants
Análisis multicriterio para la selección de tecnologías avanzadas de oxidación en el tratamiento de contaminantes emergentes
Article Sidebar
PDF
FLIP
(English)
HTML (Español (España))
Main Article Content
Although there is technical information on the efficiency of advanced oxidation technologies (TAOs) at the laboratory level, in some cases at the pilot level and few on a large scale, it is not easy to select the most appropriate technology for an effluent, since the selection of technology depends on the characteristics of the contaminated water. Through the application of the multicriteria analysis technique, this article proposes a scale of TAOs for the complementary treatment of water contaminated with contaminants emergent (CE). The chosen alternatives were the technologies with peroxide (H2O2), Ozone (O3) and Fenton (Fe/H2O2) processes, the evaluation criteria were electric energy consumption (EEO), technological maturity level, complexity of design / operation and cost of operation. The technology most recommended by AHP is ozone and peroxide / UV with a difference of 8.6% in the frequency in the evaluation of the criteria. For the AHP-TOPSIS methodology, peroxide / UV is the key technology over ozone with a difference of 31.4% in the frequency of selection.
Downloads
Article Details
M. A. C. Lozano and D. C. M. Arias, “Residuos de fármacos en alimentos de origen animal: panorama actual en Colombia,” Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 121–135, 2008.
J. C. G. Sousa, A. R. Ribeiro, M. O. Barbosa, M. F. R. Pereira, and A. M. T. Silva, “A review on environmental monitoring of water organic pollutants identified by EU guidelines,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 344, pp. 146–162, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2017.09.058.
M. Roccamante, I. Salmerón, A. Ruiz, I. Oller, and S. Malato, “New approaches to solar Advanced Oxidation Processes for elimination of priority substances based on electrooxidation and ozonation at pilot plant scale,” Catalysis Today, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.CATTOD.2019.04.014.
S. Sudhakaran, S. K. Maeng, and G. Amy, “Hybridization of natural systems with advanced treatment processes for organic micropollutant removals: New concepts in multi-barrier treatment,” Chemosphere, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 731–737, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.021.
N. N. Mahamuni and Y. G. Adewuyi, “Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: A review with emphasis on cost estimation,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 990–1003, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005.
P. Sathishkumar, R. A. A. Meena, T. Palanisami, V. Ashokkumar, T. Palvannan, and F. L. Gu, “Occurrence, interactive effects and ecological risk of diclofenac in environmental compartments and biota - a review,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 698, p. 134057, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.134057.
S. A. Fast, V. G. Gude, D. D. Truax, J. Martin, and B. S. Magbanua, “A Critical Evaluation of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Emerging Contaminants Removal,” Environmental Processes, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 283–302, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40710-017-0207-1.
X. T. Bui, T. P. T. Vo, H. H. Ngo, W. S. Guo, and T. T. Nguyen, “Multicriteria assessment of advanced treatment technologies for micropollutants removal at large-scale applications,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 563–564, pp. 1050–1067, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.191.
A. A. Zorpas and A. Saranti, “Multi-criteria analysis of sustainable environmental clean technologies for the treatment of winery’s wastewater,” International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, vol. 15, no. 1/2, p. 151, 2016, doi: 10.1504/IJGENVI.2016.074359.
S. Sudhakaran, S. Lattemann, and G. L. Amy, “Appropriate drinking water treatment processes for organic micropollutants removal based on experimental and model studies - A multi-criteria analysis study,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 442, pp. 478–488, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.076.
Y. Luo et al., “A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 473–474, pp. 619–641, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065.
C. Teodosiu, A.-F. Gilca, G. Barjoveanu, and S. Fiore, “Emerging pollutants removal through advanced drinking water treatment: A review on processes and environmental performances assessment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 197, pp. 1210–1221, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.247.
X. L. Meng, H. Zhu, and L. H. Yu, Screening method of priority pollutants in surface water source emergencies, vol. 1010–1012. 2014.
X. L. Meng, J. H. Qu, and L. H. Yu, Study on the assessment method of wastewater treatment technologies based on comprehensive scoring method, vol. 788. 2013.
J. Osorio and J. Orejuela, “El proceso de análisis jerárquico y la toma de decisiones multicriterio,” Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal, vol. XIV, no. 39, pp. 247–252, 2008, doi: 84920503044.
P. C. Manyoma-Velásquez, M. A. Pardo-Colorado, and P. Torres-Lozada, “Localización de depósitos internos para residuos sólidos hospitalarios utilizando técnicas multicriterio,” Ingenieria y Universidad, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 443–461, 2013.
I. Sirés and E. Brillas, “Remediation of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical residues based on electrochemical separation and degradation technologies: A review,” Environment International. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.07.012.
L. Rizzo et al., “Consolidated vs new advanced treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern from urban wastewater,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 655, pp. 986–1008, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.11.265.
V. Vaiano, O. Sacco, and D. Sannino, “Electric energy saving in photocatalytic removal of crystal violet dye through the simultaneous use of long-persistent blue phosphors, nitrogen-doped TiO2 and UV-light emitting diodes,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 210, pp. 1015–1021, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.11.017.
A. Durán, J. M. Monteagudo, and I. San Martín, “Operation costs of the solar photo-catalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals in water: A mini-review,” Chemosphere, vol. 211, pp. 482–488, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2018.07.170.
A. Durán, J. M. Monteagudo, and I. San Martín, “Photocatalytic treatment of an industrial effluent using artificial and solar UV radiation: An operational cost study on a pilot plant scale,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 98, pp. 1–4, May 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2011.12.007.
M. Bagheri and M. Mohseni, “Impact of hydrodynamics on pollutant degradation and energy efficiency of VUV/UV and H2O2/UV oxidation processes,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 164, pp. 114–120, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2015.08.024.
G. Matafonova and V. Batoev, “Recent advances in application of UV light-emitting diodes for degrading organic pollutants in water through advanced oxidation processes: A review,” Water Research, vol. 132, pp. 177–189, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2017.12.079.
N. Wardenier, Z. Liu, A. Nikiforov, S. W. H. Van Hulle, and C. Leys, “Micropollutant elimination by O3, UV and plasma-based AOPs: An evaluation of treatment and energy costs,” Chemosphere, vol. 234, pp. 715–724, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2019.06.033.
I. Oller, S. Malato, and J. A. Sánchez-Pérez, “Combination of Advanced Oxidation Processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination—A review,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 409, no. 20, pp. 4141–4166, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2010.08.061.
N. Wardenier, Z. Liu, A. Nikiforov, S. W. H. Van Hulle, and C. Leys, “Micropollutant elimination by O3, UV and plasma-based AOPs: An evaluation of treatment and energy costs,” Chemosphere, vol. 234, pp. 715–724, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2019.06.033.
D. B. Miklos, C. Remy, M. Jekel, K. G. Linden, J. E. Drewes, and U. Hübner, “Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review,” Water Research, vol. 139, pp. 118–131, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2018.03.042.
Z.-Y. Huo, Y. Du, Z. Chen, Y.-H. Wu, and H.-Y. Hu, “Evaluation and prospects of nanomaterial-enabled innovative processes and devices for water disinfection: A state-of-the-art review,” Water Research, vol. 173, p. 115581, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2020.115581.
E. Brillas and S. Garcia-Segura, “Benchmarking recent advances and innovative technology approaches of Fenton, photo-Fenton, electro-Fenton, and related processes: A review on the relevance of phenol as model molecule,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 237, p. 116337, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2019.116337.
I. A. Katsoyiannis, S. Canonica, and U. von Gunten, “Efficiency and energy requirements for the transformation of organic micropollutants by ozone, O3/H2O2 and UV/H2O2,” Water Research, vol. 45, no. 13, pp. 3811–3822, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2011.04.038.
R. Andreozzi, V. Caprio, A. Insola, and R. Marotta, “Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery,” Catalysis Today, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 51–59, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00102-9.
M. Solis and S. Silveira, “Technologies for chemical recycling of household plastics – A technical review and TRL assessment,” Waste Management, vol. 105, pp. 128–138, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2020.01.038.
X. Zhou et al., “Review of global sanitation development,” Environment International, vol. 120, pp. 246–261, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2018.07.047.
A. Gherghel, C. Teodosiu, and S. De Gisi, “A review on wastewater sludge valorisation and its challenges in the context of circular economy,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 228, pp. 244–263, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.04.240.
R. F. Beims, C. L. Simonato, and V. R. Wiggers, “Technology readiness level assessment of pyrolysis of trygliceride biomass to fuels and chemicals,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 112, pp. 521–529, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2019.06.017.
G. Iervolino, I. Zammit, V. Vaiano, and L. Rizzo, “Limitations and Prospects for Wastewater Treatment by UV and Visible-Light-Active Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: A Critical Review,” Topics in Current Chemistry. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s41061-019-0272-1.
D. Tompkins et al., “EU Horizon 2020 Research for A Sustainable Future: INNOQUA—A Nature-Based Sanitation Solution,” Water, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 2461, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3390/w11122461.
J. J. Rueda-Marquez, I. Levchuk, P. Fernández Ibañez, and M. Sillanpää, “A critical review on application of photocatalysis for toxicity reduction of real wastewaters,” Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120694.
R. Stirling, W. S. Walker, P. Westerhoff, and S. Garcia-Segura, “Techno-economic analysis to identify key innovations required for electrochemical oxidation as point-of-use treatment systems,” Electrochimica Acta, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135874.
E. Brillas and S. Garcia-Segura, “Benchmarking recent advances and innovative technology approaches of Fenton, photo-Fenton, electro-Fenton, and related processes: A review on the relevance of phenol as model molecule,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 237, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116337.
G. Iervolino, I. Zammit, V. Vaiano, and L. Rizzo, “Limitations and Prospects for Wastewater Treatment by UV and Visible-Light-Active Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: A Critical Review,” Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 378, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s41061-019-0272-1.
T. Coward, H. Tribe, and A. P. Harvey, “Opportunities for process intensification in the UK water industry: A review,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 21, pp. 116–126, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.11.010.
A. Gherghel, C. Teodosiu, and S. De Gisi, “A review on wastewater sludge valorisation and its challenges in the context of circular economy,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 228, pp. 244–263, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.240.
L. Rizzo et al., “Best available technologies and treatment trains to address current challenges in urban wastewater reuse for irrigation of crops in EU countries,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 710. Elsevier B.V., Mar-2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136312.
S. Jiménez, M. Andreozzi, M. M. Micó, M. G. Álvarez, and S. Contreras, “Produced water treatment by advanced oxidation processes,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 666, pp. 12–21, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.02.128.
M. I. Stefan, “ Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment - Fundamentals and Applications ,” Water Intelligence Online, 2017, doi: 10.2166/9781780407197.
