Evaluation of the quality of the silage obtained from the uniformization pruning in intensive silvopastoral systems
Evaluación de la calidad del ensilado obtenido de la poda de uniformización en sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos
Article Sidebar
HTML (Español (España))
PDF
FLIP
(English)
Main Article Content
The objective of the present work was to evaluate the nutritional composition of the silage made from the material collected from the uniformization pruning in an intensive SSP with buttercup. (Tithonia diversifolia) y tilo (Sambucus nigra), and mixed in different proportions with sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum) and King grass (Pennisetum hybridum), using a commercial additive of lactic acid bacteria and ruiminal content (rumination). Six treatments were evaluated with five repetitions and a weight of 10 kg per treatment, distributed as follows: T1: 25% T. diversifolia + 25% S. nigra + 50% S. officinarum with commercial additive (BTCac), T2: T1 with ruiminal content (BTCru), T3: 25% T. diversifolia + 25% S. nigra + 50% + P. hybridum with commercial additive (BTPac), T4: T3 with ruiminal content (BTPru) T5: 25% T. diversifolia + 25% S. nigra + 25% S. officinarum + 25% P. hybridum with commercial additive (BTCPac), T6: T5 with ruiminal content (BTCPru). With the obtained data an asymmetric factorial design of two levels was carried out, the analyzed variables were: dry matter (MS), ash (CEN), crude protein (PC), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), lignin (LIG) processed by NIRS , through agreement U of A - DaryCaby and pH. The CEN presented significant difference (p <0.05) between treatments BTCac (11.92%), BTCru (11.62%) and BTCPac (14.76%), BTCPru (14.80%), BTPac (14 , 66%), BTPru (13.86%), but not between additives or interaction between treatment and additives, the NDF presented significant difference (p = 0.0375) among additives (58.08% and 60.39% commercial and ruiminal content respectively), but not between treatments or interaction between additive and treatments, lignin (LIG) presented a significant difference (p <0.05) between treatments BTCac (5.1%) and BTCPru (7.5%) ), BTPac (7.6%), BTPru (6.8%), and interaction between additive and treatments and there was no significant difference between treatments, the pH presented a significant difference (p <0.05) between treatments BTCac (4.1), BTCru (4.2) and BTCPac (4.7), BTCPru (4.6), BTPac (4.6), BTPru (4.8), and there was no difference between additives or interaction between additive and treatments, the MS and Pc did not present a significant difference among treatments, or interaction between additive and treatments, with averages of 16.5% and 10.7% respectively.
Downloads
Article Details
E. R. Murgueitio, J. D. Chará, A. J. Solarte, F. Uribe, C. Zapata, and J. E. Rivera, “Agroforestería Pecuaria y sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos (SSPi) para la adaptación ganadera al cambio climático con sostenibilidad,” Rev. Colomb. Ciencias Pecu., vol. 26, pp 313-316, 2013.
M. Ibrahim, C. Villanueva, and F. Casasola, “Sistemas silvopastoriles como una herramienta para el mejoramiento de la productividad y rehabilitación ecológica de paisajes ganaderos en centro américa,” Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim., vol. 15, pp. 74–88, 2007.
Murgueitio E., Uribe F., Molina C., Molina E., Galindo W., Chará J., Flores M., Giraldo C., Cuartas C., Naranjo J., Solarte L., González J. 2016. Establecimiento y manejo de sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos con leucaena. Murgueitio E., Galindo W., Chará J,. Uribe F. (eds). Editorial CIPAV. Cali, Colombia. 220p.
G.A Hidalgo, W. G. Bravo, J, H Vera, "Ensilaje de maíz y su influencia sobre parámetros productivos en vacas mestizas del trópico," Revista de las Agrociencias, Núm. 20 (2018): Julio-Diciembre. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33936/la_tecnica.v0i20.1151
A. S. Oliveira et al., “Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 4587–4603, 2017.
A. Dávila Hidalgo, M. Lepe Lopez, E. Polanco, C. Saavedra, and D. Guerra Centeno, “Determinación del valor nutricional y evaluación sensorial del ensilado de Sorghum vulgare y Tithonia diversifolia,” Rev. electrónica Vet., vol. 17, no. 10, p. 12, 2016.
C. Gastón A, “Efecto del proceso de ensilaje sobre el valor nutricional de Pennisetum purpureum , Tithonia diversifolia y Trichanthera gigantea,” Investig. Unisarc, vol. 10, no. 2, 2016.
T. F. Bernardes et al., “Silage review: Unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold regions,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 4001–4019, 2018.
E. Siebald, “Buenos ensilajes: Factores que afectan la calidad del ensilaje de praderas.,” Inf. INIA Remehue N° 2, Inst. Investig. Agropecu. – Cent. Reg. Investig. Remehue, vol. 2, p. 2, 2012.
Z. G. Ashbell, G., and Weinberg., “Ensilaje de cereales y cultivos forrajeros en el trópico.,” Memorias la Conf. electrónica la FAO sobre el ensilaje en los trópicos. Estud. FAO Prod. y protección Veg., pp. 111–119., 2001.
P. McDonald, R. a Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, C. a Morgan, L. a Sinclair, and R. G. Wilkinson, ANIMAL NUTRITION, 7th ed. 2002.
R. Suárez, et al., “Evaluation of mixed silages of Saccharum officinarum and Gliricidia sepium using additives,” Pastos y Forrajes, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 69–85, 2011.
T. Carvajal and A. Cuesta, “Conservación y composición nutricional del follaje de sauco ( Sambucus nigra ) Conservation and nutritional composition of the elder ( Sambucus nigra ) foliage,” Pastos y Forrajes, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 125–132, 2016.
G. Blanco, D. Chamorro, and L. Arreaza, “Predicción de la respuesta productiva en bovinos lecheros suplementados con ensilaje de sambucus peruviana, Acacia decurrens y Avena sativa usando el modelo Cornell Net Carbohydrate and System and Protein system (CNCPS).,” Rev. CORPOICA, vol. 6 N°2, pp. 86–90, 2005.
R. E. Muck, E. M. G. Nadeau, T. A. McAllister, F. E. Contreras-Govea, M. C. Santos, and L. Kung, “Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 4001-4019, 2018.
A. Morales, D. Gutierrez, R. Rodriguez, and L. Sarduy, “Efecto del aditivo VITAFERT en la composición química e indicadores organolépticos en ensilados de Tithonia diversifolia y Pennisetum purpureum.,” vol. 1, pp. 2–7, 2013.
A. D. Echeverria, T. Bremm, L. E. Tadielo, O. D. Colleta, and D. D. Castagnara, “Conservação dos resíduos da poda de oliveiras na forma de silagem,” Rev. Agric. Neotrop., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 7–13, 2015.
J. L. P. Daniel et al., “Fibre digestibility and its relationships with chemical and morphological traits in thirty-two sugarcane varieties,” Grass Forage Sci., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 545–555, 2017.
R. J. Merry, K. F. Lowes and A. L.Winters, “Current and future approaches to biocontrol in silage. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Forage Conservation,” Research Institute of Animal Nutrition, Brno., Vol. 29, pp. 17- 27, 1997.
E. Charmley, “Towards improved silage quality – A review,” Can. J. Anim. Sci., vol. 81, no. 957, pp. 157–168, 2001.
