Obtaining inferences in documents internship described ontological level
Obtención de inferencias en documentos de pasantía descritos a nivel ontológico
Main Article Content
Background: The number of users that currently appropriates query practices using document systems has grown significantly, however, the conventional use of textual or syntactical search processes produces a vast amount of low-relevant results, forcing the user to employ a large number of hours to access the results provided and to determine those with a high level of correspondence with their field of interest. Objective: The main objective of this work was to obtain a set of inferences through predicate logic, from an internship documents ontological model, which allow to obtain implicit information from semantic descriptions representing each one of the referenced documents. Methods: The ontological model was obtained by consulting standards and provisions about internships, setting the domain concepts and the corresponding relations between concepts; the model computational representation was developed with OWL language and first-order predicate logic were used to establish the sentences that allow making inferences, to get implicit information in the knowledge base. Results: Among the most significant inferences that were obtained are: the classification of documents related to a topic of interest and the identification of teachers by areas of expertise. Conclusion: The application of predicate logic to internship documents allows to dynamically make inferences about the content represented at ontological level and can be used to complement the explicitly described information in the model, regarding issues and areas of expertise of the teachers, regardless of the location of document repositories. The statements used can be applied to other types of degree as research and monography.
Downloads
Article Details
Teseo. Servicio de consultas. Marzo de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: https://www.educacion.gob.es/teseo/irGestionarConsulta.do.
Cybertesis. Servicio de consultas. Marzo de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/.
SINAB. Repositorio institucional. Marzo de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: http://www.sinab.unal.edu.co/.
E. Abreo y C. Padilla, “Prototipo para recuperación semántica de información de proyectos de grado en ingeniería de sistemas con base en un repositorio ontológico”, Redes de Ingeniería, vol. 3, no. 1, pp.109-118, 2012.
J. Hendler, “Agents and the semantic web”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 30-37, march 2001.
T. Gruber, “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing”, International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, vol. 43, no. 5-6, pp. 907- 928, Nov./Dec. 1995.
N. Noy, y D. McGuinness, “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology”. Marzo de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: http//www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinnessabstract.html.
S. Márquez, “Ontologías”, en La Web Semántica, Ed. Barcelona: España, 2007, pp. 49-50.
OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. Marzo de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.
S. Ramírez, Y. Alonso, V. Hernández, A. C. Arias y D. La Rosa, “Comparando UML y OWL en la representación del conocimiento: correspondencia sintáctica”, Revista Española de Innovación, Calidad e Ingeniería del Software, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 87-90, 2010.
S. Russell y P. Norvig, “Representación del conocimiento”, en Inteligencia Artificial Un Enfoque Moderno, Ed. Aragón: España, 2004, pp. 401-402.
I. Flores, “Introducción al razonamiento sobre ontologías”, Centro de Ingeniería de Software y Sistemas, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17-19, 2011.
D. Lorge, “Predicate logic for software engineering”, IEEE Transactions On Software Engineering, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 856-858, 1993. [14] L. Floridi, “Open problems in the philosophy of information”, Metaphilosophy LLC and Blackwell Publishing Ltd, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 560-561, july 2004.
A. Ali y M. Khan, “Knowledge representation of urdu text using predicate logic”, en International Conference on Emerging Technologies, Islamabad, 2010, pp. 293-294.
J. Mylopoulos y H. Levesque, “An overview of knowledge representation”, ACM SIGMOD Record, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 5-7, 1980. [17] K. Onot, S. Kawanott, Y. F‘ukazawat y T. Kadokurat, “A resolution method from predicate logic specification into executable code”, en IEEE Conference Publications, Kauai, 1992, pp. 481-483.
U. del Rosario. “Reglamento sobre procesos de grado”. Abril de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: http://www. urosario.edu.co/cpg-ri/Pasantias-Grado/ documentos/reglamento-de-procesosde-grado/.
U. Distrital. “Procedimiento de iniciación de pasantía como modalidad de trabajo de grado”. Abril de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: http://www.udistrital.edu.co:8080/documents/47880/1b3595b8- 8f1d-4ebc-9256-8295e26d9579.
U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky y P. Smyth, “From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases”. Marzo de 2015. [Online]. Disponible en: http://www.csd.uwo.ca/faculty/ling/cs435/fayyad.pdf.
A. Ali y M. Khan, “Selecting Predicate Logic for Knowledge Representation by Comparative Study of Knowledge Representation Schemes”, en International Conference on Emerging Technologies, Islamabad, 2009, pp.23-24.