Perception of use of ecosystem services among cheese producers in Chitagá, North of Santander
Percepción de uso de servicios ecosistémicos entre los productores de queso tipo Chitagá, Norte de Santander
Article Sidebar
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
Main Article Content
Chitagá type cheese is a nationally recognized product for its special characteristics that are indicated as a product of the natural and human conditions present in the geographical place where milk is produced and cheese is processed. This study identified the perception of use of ecosystem services (ES) among Chitagá cheese producers. To determine perception, the box test methodology for ecosystem services was applied to cheese producers; Likewise, a survey was applied to determine the perception of use and change of ecosystem services among the 58 producers who provide cow's milk to cheese producers. The most relevant supply ecosystem service for producers is water and it is perceived together with the water regulation and water purification service as the most influential benefits for the dairy sector in the municipality of Chitagá. Producers perceive greater use of supply services (75%) and regulation (50%). Cultural services are the least known, however, aesthetic enjoyment and cultural identity are important to cheese producers. The perception of ES use by producers is associated with the presence in the region of strategic ecosystems such as the Almorzadero páramo and its direct influence on both agricultural and livestock production systems. Climate regulation, the origin and quality of water are the main services perceived by cheese producers that may be related to the quality of Chitagá cheese.
Downloads
Article Details
A. H. Santoyo, M. C. Vilardell, M. A. L. Sánchez, R. C. Fernández, and V. E. P. León , “La Ciencia Económica y el Medio Ambiente: un aporte desde la valoración económica ambiental,” Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento, vol. 34, n. 125, pp. 25-38, dic. 2013.
E. Martínez, et al., “Tisere: Una propuesta metodológica para la conformación o el fortalecimiento de territorios innovadores y socioecológicamente resilientes,” Bogotá: Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria, 2020.
R. Haines and M. Potschin, “Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services,” Policy Brief, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2018, doi: 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108
B. Czúcz, et al., “Where concepts meet the real world: A systematic review of ecosystem service indicators and their classification using CICES,” Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 145-157, 2008, doi: doi.org/10.1016/J.Ecoser.2017.11.018.
C. Gómez, et al., “Protocolo para la identificación y evaluación de los procesos de degradación de suelos y tierras por desertificación,” Bogotá: IGAC, IDEAM, MAVDT, 2010.
B. Martín and C. Montes, “Biodiversidad y servicios de los ecosistemas,” Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España, vol. 2, no. 1. pp. 444-465. 2011.
B. Martín, et al. Guía docente Ciencias de la sostenibilidad. Madrid: Universidad del Magdalena, Instituto Humboldt, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2012.
K. Ilkwon, L. Jae, and K. Hyuksoo, “Participatory ecosystem service assessment to enhance environmental decision-making in a border city of South Korea,” Ecosystem Services, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 101-337, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101337.
L. Hang, et al., “Emergy-based evaluation of world coastal ecosystem services,” Water Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 117-656, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117656.
J. Metzger, et al., “Considering landscape-level processes in ecosystem service assessments,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 796, no. 2, pp. 149-028, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149028.
W. Abera, et al., “Impacts of land use and land cover dynamics on ecosystem services in the Yayo coffee forest biosphere reserve, southwestern Ethiopia,” Ecosystem Services, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 10-38, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.1016/J.Ecoser.2021.101338.
L. Castello and J. P., Castello, “Problemas en el estudio y manejo de pesquerías tropicales,” Gaceta Ecológica, vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 65-73, 2007.
Á. M., Arango, et al., “Los servicios ecosistémicos desde la percepción de los productores de café de Belén de Umbría, Risaralda, Colombia,” Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81-94, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22490/21456453.3443
S. Martínez, et al., “Ciudades y biodiversidad: Percepción de los servicios ecosistémicos en la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogotá,” Gestión y Ambiente, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 903-322, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v24n1. 90322
A. Zuluaga, J. Durán and J. García, “Desarrollo rural de autogestión comunitaria. conflictos ambientales por recursos hídricos en pamplona (Norte de Santander–Colombia),” Revista Aglala, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 208-226, 2020.
I. E. Gamboa, et al., “Plan maestro de reconversión agropecuaria de la cadena láctea, región nororiente,” Bogotá: UPRA, 2021.
L. Granados and C. Álvarez, “Descripción del proceso metodológico para la caracterización de productos con denominación de origen,” Perspectivas Rurales, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 1-15, 2011.
Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria, “Cultivo comercial de papa: identificación de zona aptas en Colombia, a escala 1:100.000,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.upra.gov.co/documents/10184/13821/Zonificaci%C3%B3n_papa
F. Quétier, E. Tapella, G. Conti, D. Cáceres, and S. Díaz, “Servicios ecosistémicos y actores sociales. Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos para un estudio interdisciplinario,” Gaceta Ecológica, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 84-85, 2007.
S. A. Medina-Valdivia, C. Maganda-Ramírez, R. C. Almazán-Núñez, A. L. Rodríguez-Herrera, C. Rodríguez-Alviso and J. L. Rosas-Aceved., “Valoración participativa de servicios ecosistémicos en laguna de Nuxco, Guerrero,” Regions & Cohesion, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 83-110, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.3167/reco.2021.110205
S. Chen, G. Li, Z. Yuefei, X. Zhongguo, et al., “Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the yangtze river delta, china: Response to urbanizing variation,” Urban Ecosystems, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 313-328, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01150-2.
Universidad de Pamplona and Instituto Alexander Von Humboldt, “Caracterización del complejo páramo Almorzadero Norte de Santander,” sept. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.unipamplona.edu.co/unipamplona/portalIG/home_64/recursos/01general/18092014/caracterizacion_paramos.jsp
S. Quijas, et al., “Plant diversity and generation of ecosystems services at the landscape scale: expert Kowledge assessment,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 929-940, 2012, doi:10.2307/23259199
D. Rivera and C. Rodríguez, “Guía divulgativa de criterios para la delimitación de páramos de Colombia. 2011. Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial e Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt”, pp. 68. 2012.
