Using learning styles in learning objects: a case study in a colombian public university
Aplicando estilos de aprendizaje sobre objetos de aprendizaje: un caso de estudio en una universidad pública colombiana
Main Article Content
Background: computer-programming courses aren’t easy to study. Some authors have studied the difficulties in learning programming to support developing learning materials for basic programming courses. In Colombia there is an approach to teaching programming using an active learning approach (Interactive Learning Objects – ILOs) as one of the components that reinforce their pedagogical model, by supporting the generation of high-level programming skills. Objective: we want to explore the possibilities of using Learning Styles and Team Learning to increase the learning levels of Computer Programming students. Methods: this study was applied outside of the classroom in order to encourage autonomous learning. To do this we’ll pick a sample and apply a series of comparative tests between research groups. Results: the objective was met by effectively showing that providing content based LS and team-based leaning can improve a student’s performance. The intervention group grades were better than those of the comparison group though they should be analyzed further to get a more accurate conclusion. Conclusion: This study will give us the chance to see whether the strategy can be applied to the Francisco de Paula Santander University students.
Downloads
Article Details
Francisco de Paula Santander University. School of System Engineering. Academic Curriculum. [Online]. Available at: http://ingsistemas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/informacion-programa/pensum
DANE, “Encuesta de Calidad de Vida 2012. Presentación De Resultados Región Central”. [Online]. Available at: http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/condiciones_vida/calidad_vida/ECV_2012_RegionCentral.pdf
A. Sánchez Jabba, “El bilingüismo en los bachilleres colombianos,” Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economía Regional 009225, Banco De La República - Economía Regional. 2012
T. Jenkins, “The motivation of students of programming”. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, Canterbury, United Kingdom. 2001.
J. Villalobos, “Proyecto Cupi2 – Una Solución Integral al Problema de Enseñar y Aprender a Programar”. Colombia Aprende. 2009
E. Lahtinen, K. Ala-Mutka and H. Jarvinen, “A study of the difficulties of novice programmers”. Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education - ITiCSE ‘05. 2005
J. Sajaniemi, P. Byckling, and P. Gerdt, “Animation Metaphors for ObjectOriented Concepts”, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 178, pp. 15-22, 2007
J. A. Villalobos, N. A. Calderon, and C. H. Jimenez, “Developing programming skills by using interactive learning objects”, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 151, 2009.
K. Logan, P.G. Thomas, “Learning styles in distance education students learning to program.” 14th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Brunel University, June. 2002.
O. Spektor-Levy and Y. Granot-Gilat, “The Impact of Learning with Laptops in 1:1 Classes on the Development of Learning Skills and Information Literacy among Middle School Students”. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects. vol. 8, pp. 83-96, 2012.
Ü. Çakiroğlu, B. Adnan, and Y. Akkan, Yaşar, “The Effects of Using Learning Objects in Two Different TOJET, vol. 11, no. 1, 2012.
D. A. Wiley, “Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy”. Wiley, D.A. (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: [Online]. Available at: http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc
P. Polsani, “Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects”, Journal of Digital Information, vol. 3, no. 4, feb 2006.
N. Pukkhem and W. Vatanawood, “Personalised learning object based on multi-agent model and learners’ learning styles”. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, 2011.
V. Adamchik, and A. Gunawardena, “A learning objects approach to teaching programming,” Information Technology: Coding and Computing [Computers and Communications], 2003. Proceedings. ITCC 2003. International Conference on, pp.96,99, 28-30 April 2003.
S. Conceição and R. Lehman, “An evaluation of the use of learning objects as an instructional aid in teaching adults”. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, pp. 44-49. 2003.
G. E. Kaiser. Constructing learning objects, 2002.
R. H. Kay, “Examination of the Impact of Learning Objects in Secondary School”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 24, pp. 447-461, 2008.
S. Ruey-Shiang, “A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums”, Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 111-120, January, 2012.
J. W. Keefe, “Learning style: an overview”. 1979.
S. A. Griggs, “Learning styles counseling”. Ann Arbor: ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services, University of Michigan, 1991.
P. Honey and A. Mumford, “Using your learning styles”, 1995.
D. Kolb, “Learning style inventory technical manual”. 1976.
P. Rodriguez, “Implementación de una estrategia de divulgación del conocimiento generado a partir de las líneas de investigación y de agentes educativos de la comunidad académica UFPS”. Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería de Software. 2011.
E. Y. Huang, S. Wei Lin and T. K. Huang, “What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction”, Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 338-349,2012.
P. Kim, T. Hagashi, L. Carillo, I. Gonzales, T. Makany, B. Lee and A. Gàrate, “Socioeconomic strata, mobile technology, and education: a comparative analysis”. Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 59, pp. 465-486, 2011.